DON
CARLOS ON DISC -- RANDOM JOTTINGS
--Geoffrey Riggs
[I've
been obsessed enough over the years to indulge in various random jottings on a
recording here, a recording there. There's no "rhyme or reason" to which
ones I've scribbled on and on about. But on the offchance that some of my scribblings
may be useful, I've assembled here, on a pretty arbitrary basis, some of the takes
I have in various hideaway corners of my hard disk (from two or three different
word processing aps!). Hope they make some sense as a whole. I hope I've combed
out the more unclear topical references here to that exchange or this one, etc.
But if there are still a few that are unclear, we can always put it down to this
having been cobbled together from various sources in a tremendous (and probably
inexcusable) hurry.]
French
recordings (strictly a sampling):
"LIVE"
(variously dated, most sources give 1976)
Generally thought to be the earliest
French-language Don Carlos easily available, issued on VOCE and PONTO, among other
labels. Maestro John Matheson is to be commended for being a virtual pioneer in
restoring this original version to the light of day. With the lyric Andre Turp
in the title role and with variable colleagues, this has definite vocal flaws.
But it has the distinction of being possibly the only French-language version
with an almost entirely Gallic and idiomatic cast, a notable exception being the
very young Robert Lloyd in a supporting role. Matheson gives a reasonably strong
spine to this literally complete performance, first act included.
STUDIO
(1984)
The DG French recording under Claudio Abbado has often expressionless
(or nearly so) singing with clearly phonetic (after a fashion) French that has
not been internalized into an organic expression of poetry + music = drama at
all. Domingo heads the cast. This set is textually probably the closest to what
Verdi would have recognized as his own, following Modena 1886 (1884 revision +
Act I restoration), his final thoughts. In fact, this is textually the edition
that ultimately makes the most sense to me (some sources claim that even in his
later revisions for Italy, Verdi was still working with the French text). Since
this set, though, has no spine (surprisingly so, in view of Abbado's usually being
stronger than this), IMO, I look further.
"LIVE"
VIDEO (1996)
The CD edition of the Alagna shows Alagna sounding quite pressed
and uncomfortable, IMO, which disqualifies this as any kind of first choice, in
my view. The title role is the title role, after all. Oddly, the VIDEO edition
of the same production seems to be made up of somewhat different material, where
Alagna sounds more comfortable. Hardly a world-beater, mind you (and Alagna can
be caught sounding _much_ better than even this in other repertoire that's out
there), but at least plausible. The chief vocal problems that remain are the lack
of true bel canto flexibility in Waltraud Meier's Eboli (although she still has
her moments) and Eric Halfvarson's Inquisitor, which is unspeakably bad: no sense
of poetry, no musical line, no vocal control whatsoever. In addition, the performing
edition is just plain weird. It jumps from version to version with no textual
consistency whatsoever. One must grant, though, that Pappano's conducting shows
greater narrative strength than we have on either the DG or the earlier Ponto.
[Since writing that paragraph, I have relistened to some of Meier's scenes, and
I feel that perhaps I was a bit too harsh here; while her bel canto capacities
may not be comparable to a Verrett or a Cossotto's, there is, in fact, more to
admire than to regret in Meier's perf., IMO.]
Italian
recordings (strictly a sampling):
"LIVE"
(1950)
The "live" Met set from 1950 shows Bjoerling at his absolute
peak. It was this revival (directed by Margaret Webster) and the Covent Garden
prod. from '58 (directed by Lucchino Visconti) that finally put this masterpiece
on the map in English-speaking countries, and one must be grateful for that (oddly,
a starry Met revival in the '20s headed by Martinelli and Ponselle failed to score
as decisively). Bjoerling and Merrill are the raison d'etre of this set. With
the two of them sounding like demigods throughout, it would be hard for anyone
else to match them here, and so it proves, IMHO. Not that the young Barbieri and
Siepi are at all bad! They are in fact tremendously exciting. It's just that Barbieri
does not have quite the bel canto ease of some other Ebolis (although far more
than Meier's, IMO), while being just as overwhelming an interpreter, and Siepi
takes quite a while warming up. But when we reach his great soliloquy in his study,
his beautiful phrasing and endless breath control pay off handsomely. And the
low tones are magisterial. Hines's Inquisitor shows off a healthy young voice,
so perhaps it's ungrateful to point out that the Inquisitor should not sound the
same age as the King. Sadly, it may not be ungrateful, though, to balk at Delia
Rigal's vocal problems as Isabelle. Here is a committed artist of lofty intentions
with a richly expressive instrument that, however, is under poor control almost
throughout. She rallies somewhat in the last scene, and there are some lovely
top notes and fine phrasing. But the basic instrument is still somewhat disjointed.
Conducting is efficient here without being inspiring, but ultimately, though,
I'm bothered by the absence of the first act. Yes, trimming it to four acts was
once Verdi's own idea, but he thought better of it later, and he was right, I
feel. For one thing, the poignant qualities of Isabelle's big aria in the last
scene are compromised, IMO, if one has not heard the opening scene.
"LIVE"
(1958)
We do have the first act restored in the Covent Garden b'cast under
the (relatively) young Giulini ('58). Here, as one might hope, is the sort of
reading of this masterpiece under a superb maestro that this work deserves. Energy,
poetry, surge, nuance, shape -- and all this is combined with a distinct narrative
strength that never flags. A worthy answer to Pappano, possibly its superior,
in fact, although I'd be happy with either in an ideal set. Vickers is more moving
an interpreter than Bjoerling, and, at his youthful best, the entire voice up
to the top notes ringing and secure, but Bjoerling still has an affecting plangency
that is unique. At the same time, the heroic qualities of the Prince's high-strung
character come through better with a voice of Vickers' dramatic strength. The proper centrality of Carlo as the center of this overpowering work comes through unmistakably here. The
balance of the cast is also more consistent here than at the Met, with Brouwenstijn(sp.?),
Gobbi and Christoff in perfectly good voice. Barbieri, though, is no longer up
to Eboli. She simply "marks" all the high notes as if in a rehearsal.
Sad. Also, though one is grateful for the first act, there are numerous other
cuts throughout that can grate exceedingly.
STUDIO (1961)
The Santini recording on DG is the first one made in the studio to bring back the first act. A set with fine engineering and a cohesive sense of ensemble, this is a La Scala recording with few serious flaws in the singing and the orchestral playing, if relatively little individuality and nuance. This reading of the 5-act score is worthwhile for its completer edition than many (although there are still occasional trims throughout) and its cast's basic comfort level with Verdi from top to bottom. Although I find that neither its Carlo nor its Elisabetta, Labo and Stella, bring much personality to their music, honest vocalism from the two still counts for something. There is much more than just that from Christoff's King: admittedly eccentric tones offset one of the most highly individual readings on this or any set. Christoff's King is almost visual in its impact, spotlighting all the terror this role can evoke -- and all the sorrow. The finest contribution here comes from the young Cossotto's Eboli: both individuality and classically beautiful tones combine to create the most idiomatic and inspired reading of the set. Bastianini's Posa does not boast such vivid artistry, but the beauty of his tones complement Cossotto's in every respect. Vinco's Inquisitor fails to make much of an impression, but he does not seriously detract from the whole. In sum, with all the small, sometimes irritating, trims done here and there, and a certain lack of profile in its conducting, five healthy voices comfortable in Verdi still combine to make this a set more good than bad, and with its fine studio engineering, it serves as a highly listenable way to be introduced to Verdi's complete 5-act design.
STUDIO
(1965)
The Solti set from the mid-'60s was the first studio attempt to record
a literally complete version, first act and much later material included. Solti -- and I'm
aware that others already say this, but it's honestly my own impression as well
-- is long on drive and energy, but short on poetry. That doesn't necessarily
make him bad at all, but it does place him a rung or so below Pappano and the
young Giulini, IMO. Bergonzi sings the Prince's music as beautifully as anyone
on disc, even though his is not quite the bewitching beauty of a Bjoerling or
the haunting loneliness of a Vickers. Tebaldi is heard somewhat past her best,
though she has her moments, and Bumbry's Eboli is one of the most exciting to
be heard. A highlight is the King/Inquisitor encounter with Nicolai Ghiaurov and
Martti Talvela. One has to wonder when this scene has sounded more terrifying.
Unfortunately, IMO, Fischer-Dieskau's Posa fails to convince on a vocal level.
Yes, he sings the music adroitly, but the sound of the instrument simply strikes
me as all wrong (my failing?), and his presence ultimately makes this set more flawed than the Santini.
"LIVE"
(1966)
A "live" in-house performance of the Met on tour, 1966,
showcases Franco Corelli's Carlo at its most sensitive and its most vocally assured.
This may be my nominee for Corelli's finest artistic achievement. No crude, truncated
phrases. No hectoring unmodulated tones. Here is tender, long-breathed singing
and imaginatively shaped phrasing under superb dynamic control. Heart-stopping
piano singing is integrated with an authentically anguished and heroic reading
that does full justice to the closest that Verdi ever came to creating a Hamlet-like
figure on the opera stage. Like Vickers, Corelli too makes the essential importance of Carlo as the core of this piece crystal clear. Kabaivanska and Ghiaurov also come through well enough, even though Ghiaurov's full greatness in the role was to emerge later. The other peak here is the Eboli of Oralia Dominguez, and when she and Corelli join forces in the garden scene, there is a true sense of Titans clashing. Maybe the greatest reading of this scene on disc? The rest of the cast is at least
effective on occasion, but the sound is highly variable, and Guadagno's conducting strikes me as strictly pro
forma.
Once again, we have no first act.....
"LIVE" (1969)
This set too has no first act. So it's out of the running for me as a first choice. But Schippers here is at his best, and if one were to judge a Don Carlo solely by its top five principals, this performance would be stronger than any on disc. Both Prevedi and Zylis-Gara are in glowing form, and everyone around them is just as fine. Ghiaurov gives one of the finest Filippos heard anywhere, and Cossotto surpasses her superb reading on the Santini set! Cappuccilli's suave Posa is not far behind. Few sets convey so unerringly the sheer beauty of this score throughout. If any recording of the original 5-act work were this consistently beautiful, it would be my automatic Top Choice. As it is, if one were to view the 4-act Italian version as a separate opera all its own (I don't, but.....), this set might qualify as the perfect recording of Verdi's third-finest opera (once we take Otello as his finest of all, and the original 5-act Don Carlos as right behind it). If only.......
"LIVE"
(1970)
The '70 Vienna revival with Corelli again doing the title role is in much better sound than his '66 performance, with a better ensemble
to boot. I do have reservations concerning Waechter, though: not a true Verdian with some of Fischer-Dieskau's hectoring delivery, IMO. More critically,
I'm afraid that Corelli's Carlo here, while occasionally ferociously engaged, simply
does not strike me as being so comfortable vocally as in '66. In absolute terms,
it is an efficient and sometimes compelling job, yes. And considering the recorded competition,
his is still a viable alternative in this role. But that uncanny sense of certain
moments virtually "singing themselves" is no longer his. One hears effort and the occasional sense that, for all his attempts at expression, the interpretation is occasionally "in quotes", so to speak. He also
does not dominate this performance like some great tragedian the way he does in
'66. Of course, when one has the finest Eboli,
King and Inquisitor on disc, perhaps one is bound to be no
more than one among equals. Verrett, Ghiaurov and Talvela surpass anyone else
I've heard in these parts, IMO -- and Verrett and Talvela surpass here what they
do elsewhere! Verrett is at her most towering and musically assured throughout,
and Ghiaurov is starting to bring out more of the deep hurt in this role. With
Talvela at his peak, he and Ghiaurov surpass what they gave under Solti. Unfortunately,
we have no Act I -- again (is it possible that Corelli never sang that opening
duet? what a loss). This has now been released in a superb state-of-the-art transfer
on ORFEO.
STUDIO
(1971)
The early '70s studio set under Giulini is looked on as a classic
by many, and it is certainly the case that when it comes to an uncut performing
edition of the Modena version in Italian (first act included) and consistently
pleasant vocalism throughout, this set measures up with no serious lapses. I do,
though, find Giulini slightly disappointing after his towering "live"
reading from the late '50s. He still does much here that is moving, and there
is rarely a moment when the greatness of Verdi's genius doesn't shine through.
But the narrative strength of his "live" performance is not always his.
This might be viewed as the yang to Solti's yin. Where Solti is more energy, Giulini
is more poetry. Would we could have both. We do with the younger Giulini at Covent
Garden. Just not here. Domingo is in healthy voice and his solid musicianship
stands him in good stead, although his vocalism has less variety of color and
dynamics to it, IMO, than, say, Bergonzi's, whose Carlo is arguably Domingo's
closest counterpart, both in terms of finished musicianship and of vocal weight
(Domingo sounds strictly like a lirico spinto at this early point in his career).
The other principals overshadow Domingo, I feel, both in terms of distinct personality
and in terms of vocal and dramatic imagination. We reverse the equation of Corelli's
'66 perf.: vivid artists around an efficient professional rather than efficient
professionals around one vivid artist. Verrett's Eboli is almost as incandescent
as she is at Vienna, and Caballe's Isabelle (Elisabetta in the Italian version)
is the finest I've ever heard. Having these two standard-setters together is luxury
casting indeed. And I greatly admire Ruggero Raimondi's King. Recordings often
don't do justice to the authentically basso resonance that Raimondi emphatically
had during these early years, and in some respects this set is no exception. But
in person, there was a true rolling quality to the tone that I treasured and that
reminded me of Siepi! Moreover, his unfailing legato and steady tone were of a
greater consistency than Siepi's, and those qualities come through clearly in
this recording. The reason why I personally preferred Siepi still came down to
Siepi's _slightly_ more imposing (but _not_ by that much!) lowest tones, and his
superb imagination as an interpreter, and the fact that at his best he could combine
Raimondi's impeccable legato and steady tone with a distinctive imagination and
charisma and elegance that were all his own. On a good night, Siepi had it all.
But Raimondi's was undoubtedly the more flexible voice, and if I had to nominate
one singer who affected me in person as the most plausible successor to Siepi,
it would be the young Raimondi in a heartbeat.
"LIVE"
(1977) -- Top Choice
Then there is a "live" Scala b'cast
from 1977. This one is under Claudio Abbado (paraphrasing Anna Russell, "do
you remember Abbado?"). Forget what we hear on the French DG. Abbado is superb
here. All the drive of the younger Giulini, all the imagination and poetry of
any other maestro you might name. This is a reading on the level of the finest
heard anywhere, IMO. And the edition, based primarily on Modena, is, in a way,
completer than complete, although we don't have the ballet. Still, the full opening
scene of an uncut Act I before Carlo's entrance is intact, the Queen's and Eboli's
switch of the "cloaks" is intact, the King's and Carlo's lament over
Posa is included, and so on. Luckily, unlike the Pappano, Verdi's last rewrite
of each and every sequence (unless it involves a cut) is always used. The one
exception is the ending, where the more extended, quieter ending is adopted instead.
But there is a kind of logic here too, since one could argue that here we have
a rewrite that also entails some cutting. As for the cast, it is mostly quite
fine. To start with, the young Carreras is heard at his most beautiful. And his
is a heartfelt and alert interpretation as well. It is geared more to a lyric
style (matching his voice), similar in that respect to Bjoerling's, while there
is never a sense the role is beyond him. Freni is deeply affecting as Elisabetta,
although she takes some time warming up (she's fine by the time she and Carreras
have their painful encounter in Act II). Cappuccilli's Posa is perfectly good,
and Nesterenko's Inquisitor is suitably chilling. Ghiaurov is again heard as the
King...........forget his relatively crude reading opposite the Corelli of '66
and his similar reading for Solti; forget even his more developed interpretation
for Vienna. This captures him at the perfect moment, displaying superb vocal control
and suave legato with a wrenching, but always musically poised, delivery of every
nuance in this tortured part. Not playing down the terror that this role can evoke
at all, Ghiaurov still lets us see into the vulnerable humanity that Verdi invested
in the King's music. And Ghiaurov has complete mastery of his range, from easy,
open top notes to authentically rich low tones that bring the music alive as no
one else quite has, in my view. This strikes me as the finest Philip on disc.
However, Obraztsova's Eboli is not the finest Eboli on disc: ungainly, approximate,
she just about gets by on sheer verve. But she doesn't really sing the written
music. It's a star turn with lots of vocal flailing around and some drama -- of
a sort. But the rich inwardness of much of the music eludes her, since she has,
IMO, neither the musicianship, the vocal flexibilty, nor the imagination to bring
it out. Yes, one can be grateful that here is a dramatically engaged reading with
a genuinely commanding instrument (she has the full range needed, from thundering
lows to ringing highs), rather than a pro forma walk-through. Thus, listeners
unaccustomed to other Ebolis could well get caught up in all the excitement. Why
not? The Scala audience here certainly does. But it remains musically uneven.
STUDIO
(1978)
This posting has gone on TOO LONG(!), so I'm going to close (arbitrarily)
with a studio set from 1978. I've simply run out of time(!) (my own dumb fault),
and I don't know when I'll be able to get back to this. The '78 studio set, happily,
features the same principals as the '77 b'cast, with the exception of the faaaaaar
more musical Agnes Baltsa replacing the uneven Obraztsova and Ruggero Raimondi's
Inquisitor replacing Nesterenko's. There is no question in my mind that, as a
whole, this features an even more consistent lineup of principals than in the
studio Giulini, even though neither Freni nor Baltsa (no world-beater, but at
least a conscientious musician) may match Caballe and Verrett. Still, hearing
these fine principals of the '77 Scala production as a whole buttressed with a
more musical Eboli than Obraztsova makes for a richer ensemble in general than
Giulini's, IMO. Among studio sets, this is therefore special. Unfortunately, where
it defers to the Domingo/Giulini is in Karajan's decision to forego Act I! Act
I happens to be one of Carreras's most affecting scenes in '77, and it's extremely
regrettable that he's not given a chance to do it again here. Moreover, for me
(as is probably tediously clear by now), I tend to relegate four-act sets to Honorable
Mention. I don't really feel I've heard this work without that opening scene and
its haunting duet. Karajan's conducting brings out the terror in this score better
than anyone, but he is not as wide-ranging in his mastery of the many different
moods in this piece as is the young Giulini and the "live" Abbado.
WRAP-UP
In
conclusion (I can hear the groans of relief;-), what I seek is an uncut performance
with a maestro who can bring out the Shak[e]spearean variety in Verdi's masterpiece,
featuring a lineup of principals who are as uniformly undaunted by the sheer vocal
range of these parts as they are genuinely imbued with the full dramatic genius
of Verdi's inspired characterizations.
Among
the sets arbitrarily summarized here, the only maestri who, IMO, attempt to encompass
the full variety of Verdi's score rather than frame it with a distinct emphasis
(hardly a bad thing either, just not what I prefer) are Pappano, the young Giulini
and the "live" Abbado. Of these three, Pappano uses a pretty arbitrary
performing edition, although he has the conviction and the vision to make it (mostly)
plausible, the young Giulini adopts many cuts, and the "live" Abbado
thankfully adopts the closest approximation to Modena, although even he makes
a few choices that lie outside it. Since the Pappano VIDEO has not one but two
problematic principals (the Eboli and the Inquisitor), and since the many cuts
in the Giulini Covent Garden are compounded by the inadequacies of the struggling
Barbieri's Eboli (in this perf.), and since the consistently Verdian Santini set also takes out a few arbitrary snips and has relatively uninspired conducting, that leaves only the "live" Abbado
as a performance with but one flaw, IMO: Obraztsova's Eboli (even she, at least,
has the range, unlike the struggling Barbieri). So the "live" Abbado
has become my personal favorite for now, even though it is not ideal in every
respect. The only one that comes close to ideal, but with no first act, is the Schippers.
[A
caveat from today: now that I have revised upward my estimate of Meier, that means
there is only one untenable principal in the Pappano VIDEO: the ludicrous Halfvarson
as the Inquisitor; so we have in the "live" '77 Carreras/Abbado a reasonably
viable performing edition with but one questionable principal {the Eboli}, in
the Pappano VIDEO, a somewhat strange perf. edition by contrast, also with one
unfortunate principal {the Inquisitor}, in the Covent Garden Giulini, an edition
with lots of cuts here and there and also one unfortunate principal {a past-her-prime
Eboli}, and in the Santini, fewer constant snips but still a slightly trimmed 5-act score with pro forma conducting -- With the Pappano VIDEO, the Covent Garden and the Santini all combining a partly
unsatisfactory edition with either a disappointing principal or a disappointing conductor, and with the '77 Abbado
using a somewhat preferable edition leaving it with only one disappointing principal
as its one flaw, the '77 Abbado remains my {grudging} Top Choice, and since Eboli
is more critical than the Inquisitor, I'd slot the Pappano VIDEO with its inadequate
Inquisitor next, with the Covent Garden slotted third, and the Santini slotted fourth -- More consistent than any of these, but with no first act, is the Schippers set with Prevedi and Zylis-Gara.]
--
Geoffrey Riggs
MARIA
CALLAS (1923 - 1977) -- HER BEST RECORDINGS IN GOOD SOUND
CARMEN
-- FROM COMEDY TO TRAGEDY
ENRICO
CARUSO (1873 - 1921) -- A BRIEF APPRECIATION
FRANCO
CORELLI (1921 - 2003) -- RECOLLECTIONS AND REFLECTIONS
DONIZETTI
AND BRINKMANSHIP
GREATEST
SINGER?
THE
TENOR AND RICHARD WAGNER (1813 - 1883)
MEISTERSINGER
ON DISC -- THE STRONGEST ENTRIES
RECALLING
ROBERT MERRILL (1917 - 2004)
NORMA -- TRADITIONS LOST AND RESTORED
PARSIFAL
ON DISC -- THE STRONGEST ENTRIES
HISTORY
OF OPERA IN MINIATURE
RICHARD
TAUBER (1891 - 1948) -- A BRIEF APPRECIATION
VIOLETTA
IN LA TRAVIATA
PARTIAL
OVERVIEW OF TRISTAN ON CD
IL
TROVATORE ON DISC -- THE STRONGEST ENTRIES
UPCOMING
SINGERS